Chris Bizer wrote:
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Ryan Lee [mailto:ryanlee_at_w3.org]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Mai 2005 18:40
> An: general_at_simile.mit.edu
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Considerations on RDF presentation
>
>
>
>>There would be no inter:type if the type wasn't used in determining the
>>lens.
>>
>>I'm not sure how useful that constraint is in the face of the more
>>advanced selectors...
>
>
> I'm also not sure, but at first sight your proposal makes sense to me. Why
> should be confuse the final visualization layer with multiple types, type
> inferences and stuff like that are jobs for the RDF layer.
Let's go further: why should we encode type information in the
intermediate tree? What is the the lens-related typing information going
to be used for in the next styling step(s)? If it is useful because we
want to keep a reference to the lens from which this tree fragment
originates, why not keep a direct and unambiguous reference to the lens
itself?
--
Emmanuel Pietriga
INRIA Futurs - Projet In Situ tel : +33 1 69 15 34 66
Bat 490, Université Paris-Sud fax : +33 1 69 15 65 86
91405 ORSAY Cedex FRANCE http://www.lri.fr/~pietriga
Received on Wed May 04 2005 - 09:15:20 EDT