On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 19:55 -0500, David Huynh wrote:
> The validator here
> http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/
> says that that DOAP resource validates successfully but it contains no
> triple. This is actually curious-- The <RDF> tag that's supposed to
> enclose the RDF content was made optional since 2004, and that validator
> mentions such is the case with many DOAP files...
>
> David
Well... I imagine you are more qualfied to tell W3 their validator is
broken than I am.
However, if that DOAP is in fact valid, according to post 2004 rules
anyway, why doesn't Piggy Bank accept it?
Oli
Received on Sun Dec 11 2005 - 00:57:27 EST