Ryan Lee wrote:
>> Coming back to the other pending vocabulary issues, I found this posting:
>>
>>>>> For 1., I agree that behavior is a separate issue, but turning a URI
>>>>> into a URL is a common enough occurence that it's worth including
>>>>> in core. I am going to include it since I think we've all pretty
>>>>> much stated our agreement and consider the matter resolved.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes. Wouldn't there be some XLink term we could reuse here? (just
>>>> wondering).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, we should have something like that in Fresnel. Any concrete
>>> solution
>>> OK with me.
>>
>>
>>
>> So, we all agreed that we should have it. What do you think about
>> modelling
>> it with Fresnel:value?
>>
>> :websiteStyle rdf:type fresnel:Style ;
>> fresnel:styleDomain foaf:homepage ;
>> fresnel:value fresnel:url .
>>
>> (http://simile.mit.edu/repository/fresnel/trunk/docs/manual/FresnelVocabular
>>
>> y.htm#displayingValues)
>>
>> which could mean:
>> 1. Display the URL and make it clickable.
>> 2. Display the label of the resource if it has one (otherwise URL)
>> and
>> make it clickable.
>>
>> I would prefer option 2.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
>
> I agree that 2. is the preferable option.
Forgot to answer that part yesterday: I am also in favour of 2.
--
Emmanuel Pietriga
INRIA Futurs - Projet In Situ tel : +33 1 69 15 34 66
Bat 490, Université Paris-Sud fax : +33 1 69 15 65 86
91405 ORSAY Cedex FRANCE http://www.lri.fr/~pietriga
Received on Thu Jun 16 2005 - 03:57:21 EDT