RE: Restarting and structuring the ontology discussion

From: Butler, Mark H (Labs Bristol) <"Butler,>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:55:21 +0100

Hi Chris

> 4.1. Status
> We have collected the different proposals for
> RDF path languages. I used some pseudo-RDF path in my FOAF example
> http://simile.mit.edu/repository/fresnel/examples/foaf.n3
> Mark and Emmanuel opt for forming a separate W3C task force for this.

No, no, you are doing exactly the right thing.

I was just commenting that I think this is something that should happen,
it shouldn't get in the way of your work on the display.

May be this is really obvious and I am telling you stuff you already
know - if so apologies. It's just I've observed several different groups
encountering this problem, so I just wanted to bring it to the attention
of people here (particularly Eric Miller).

Eric, are you here?

Mark
Received on Wed Oct 06 2004 - 16:10:27 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Aug 09 2012 - 16:39:17 EDT