Regarding a name for the ontology, I'd like to propose VOWL, the view
ontology web language. Or else HOWL, the human-accesible OWL.
Mailing-List: contact general-help_at_simile.mit.edu; run by ezmlm
X-No-Archive: yes
Reply-To: <general_at_simile.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 20:11:54 -0400
From: Ryan Lee <ryanlee_at_w3.org>
X-LocalTest: Nonlocal Origin ([18.51.2.218]
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.63
X-SpamBouncer: 2.0 beta (9/23/04)
X-SBPass: NoBounce
X-SBClass: OK
X-Folder: Bulk
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Butler, Mark H (Labs Bristol) wrote:
>
>> Hi team
>>
>>> RDO is boring and sounds like "remote data objects". Let's ask the guy
>>> who came up with "Longwell" ;-)
>>
>> it breaks the (bristol) naming convention, but seeing as you are using
>> lenses how about "fresnel".
>
> +1 (Mark's the one who came up with Longwell, for those who were not
> here at that time)
Good choice. I've moved the files from rdo to fresnel:
http://simile.mit.ed/repository/fresnel/
--
Ryan Lee ryanlee_at_w3.org
W3C Research Engineer +1.617.253.5327
http://simile.mit.edu/
Received on Mon Oct 11 2004 - 05:50:30 EDT