Re: Freezing the Fresnel Vocabulary

From: Ryan Lee <ryanlee_at_w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:54:58 -0500

Chris Bizer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think Fresnel vocabularies have reached a pretty mature state and our
> discussion tend to focus on really small details and rather esoteric cases.
> The common cases can be handled by the current vocabularies without major
> problems.
>
> So I think it would be a good idea to freeze the Fresnel vocabularies after
> our meeting today and wait with further changes until we got more experience
> from implementing and using the stuff to visualize more real-world
> ontologies.
>
> This would mean:
> 1. Include the changes to the lens and style names proposed by Emmanuel.
> 2. See if David Karger comes up with further problems today and then solve
> them.
> 3. Freeze the vocabs and concentrate on documentation and implementation
> afterwards.
>
> What do you think?

Good idea; it would also give me a chance to finalize the OWL for the
core part of the vocabulary and head into the extended portion.

-- 
Ryan Lee                 ryanlee_at_w3.org
W3C Research Engineer    +1.617.253.5327
http://simile.mit.edu/
Received on Thu Mar 24 2005 - 17:54:45 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Aug 09 2012 - 16:39:18 EDT