On 4/27/05, Emmanuel Pietriga <Emmanuel.Pietriga_at_lri.fr> wrote:
> The RDF/XML raw file is the source code. The XML parser can generate a
> DOM tree or any other data structure that represents the XML infoset.
> This infoset is equivalent to the AST. This means that RDF/XML+XSLT
> works at the level of the AST, instead of working at the level of a
> "semantically meaningful representation of the program". Wrong level of
> abstraction (too low), thus conceptually defective approach.
Is it then also conceptually defective to work on object-oriented
representations of the graph? Objects/members/methods aren't
semantically meaningful at the RDF graph level either.
Cheers,
Danny.
--
http://dannyayers.com
Received on Wed Apr 27 2005 - 09:42:54 EDT