Re: Comments on 'precedural approaches'

From: Danny Ayers <>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:43:47 +0200

On 4/27/05, Emmanuel Pietriga <> wrote:

> The RDF/XML raw file is the source code. The XML parser can generate a
> DOM tree or any other data structure that represents the XML infoset.
> This infoset is equivalent to the AST. This means that RDF/XML+XSLT
> works at the level of the AST, instead of working at the level of a
> "semantically meaningful representation of the program". Wrong level of
> abstraction (too low), thus conceptually defective approach.

Is it then also conceptually defective to work on object-oriented
representations of the graph? Objects/members/methods aren't
semantically meaningful at the RDF graph level either.


Received on Wed Apr 27 2005 - 09:42:54 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Aug 09 2012 - 16:39:18 EDT