1. very pedantic but: why mix the terms "Property" (O.O.ish) and
"Resource", very RDF. Why not ...
<inter:Resource>
...
<inter:Predicate>
<inter:uri>
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/mbox</inter:uri>
<inter:label>...</inter:label>
<inter:literal>xxx</inter:literal>
</inter:Predicate>
or hide the RDF:
<inter:Object>
<inter:id>
<inter:Property>
etc ...
The latter is better for generic content builders - those that can take
content from SQL results or basic XML etc.
2. I think most builders would do their own "content-before",
"content-after" stuff. Surely a list knows how to comma and stop
itself, a tree, how to make columns?
>> <inter:label> Mailbox </inter:label>
>> <inter:value> emmanuel_at_irina.org </inter:value>
>> <inter:contentAfter>, <inter:contentAfter>
>> <inter:value> emmanuel_at_w3.org </inter:value>
>> <inter:contentLat>.<inter:contentAfter>
>> <inter:Property>
On May 3, 2005, at 5:43 AM, Emmanuel Pietriga wrote:
>> <inter:Property>
>> <inter:uri>http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/mbox</inter:uri>
>> <inter:label> Mailbox </inter:label>
>> <inter:value> emmanuel_at_irina.org </inter:value>
>> <inter:contentAfter>, <inter:contentAfter>
>> <inter:value> emmanuel_at_w3.org </inter:value>
>> <inter:contentLat>.<inter:contentAfter>
>> <inter:Property>
Received on Tue May 03 2005 - 18:40:14 EDT