Re: infoURI standard officially blessed

From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:44:43 -0500

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:

> And why not just use the schema URL? No, it's not the persistence
> argument - rather uniqueness -- that schema may have several locations and
> if the client uses one, the server might recognize it by another, resulting
> in a failed transaction even though the server was capable of fulfilling the
> request.

But you could use the namespace uri; right?

Mind you, much of this conversation is over my head ;-)

Bruce
Received on Fri Nov 18 2005 - 18:38:55 EST