It seems like a good long term investment, and pretty fun to play with,
so I think I'll try to use it. Our initial output and data won't be
extremely complex. At least not anymore than complex than FOAF.
I may or may not be able to fix stuff, though I'm looking forward to
seeing if I remember anything from those graph theory courses in school. :)
For our first iteration we can just generate the static pages ahead of
time, and if we run into a hitch I'll keep some Jython/RDQL scripts as
backup.
Thanks,
Steve
Ryan Lee wrote:
> Steven Githens wrote:
>
>> Hi Stefano, thanks for the feedback!
>>
>> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>>
>>> Steven Githens wrote:
>>>
>>>> The fresnel code looks cool too, but I'm guessing that's still not
>>>> ready for production???
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No, we are actively working on it for a demo that we'll present at
>>> the end of the month.
>>
>>
>> Could you clarify this a little, I'm not sure if you meant it was or
>> was not ready for production.
>
>
> It's not production quality. I'm still actively making changes to an
> unstable codebase.
>
>> Let's say, hypothetically, that I wanted to use fresnel to output
>> html for a class website, with roughly 350 students, starting near
>> the end of March. :)
>
>
> If you want to consider beta quality, then it depends on how much work
> you want to do and how complex your needs are. If you don't mind
> reaching into the code to fix something you find isn't right or trying
> to figure out a way around it, and if what you're looking for is
> relatively simple (i.e., doesn't require anything outside of Fresnel
> Core terms), you might make it.
>
--
--
Steven Githens, Chicago IL
s-githens_at_northwestern.edu
http://www.githens.org
Received on Thu Feb 16 2006 - 18:00:18 EST