Emmanuel Pietriga wrote:
> Chris Bizer wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> an idea for the terminology issue. What about Fresnel:Format?
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> :depictFormat rdf:type fresnel:Format ;
>> fresnel:formatDomain foaf:depiction ;
>> fresnel:label fresnel:none ;
>> fresnel:value fresnel:image ;
>> fresnel:valueStyle "bla"^^fresnel:styleClass ;
>> fresnel:propertyStyle "bla2"^^fresnel:styleClass ;
>> fresnel:group :foafGroup ;
>> fresnel:contentAfter "|" .
>>
>> The term "Format" would separate the parts closely related to CSS styling
>> from the other parts like label, value and contentAfter.
>>
>> To me, "Format" sounds more declarative than "Transform" which I somehow
>> automatically associate with procedural XSLT.
>
>
> I'm not an expert in English, so I don't know the nuances, but from a
> French point of view it sounds nice.
Sounds like a winner to me. I'll try to get an updated core vocabulary
committed tomorrow.
--
Ryan Lee ryanlee_at_w3.org
W3C Research Engineer +1.617.253.5327
http://simile.mit.edu/
Received on Thu Jun 16 2005 - 22:19:53 EDT