Chris Bizer wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> I think there might be a bug in the ontology.
>
> As I understand it fresnel:FormatDescription isn't linked to anything
> because the range of fresnel:propertyStyle is datatype:string.
You may need to update the version of the ontology you're looking at as
I've made notes in the comments briefly saying the following:
It is impossible to avoid OWL Full in such a way that the range of a
*Style is either a string or an object. There are owl:DatatypeProperty
and owl:ObjectProperty classes, and not until OWL Full can they overlap.
This is not so much a bug as it is a limitation of the modelling
choices we made.
> See manual for example's where FormatDescriptions are used together with
> hook properties.
>
> The reason for having descriptions on the hook properties is that you might
> also want to define additional content that should appear before or after
> resources and not only before or after values.
>
> Do I remember this right?
I managed to cut the ontology down to OWL DL, but I suppose for
correctness' sake I should really bring it back to OWL Full; those cuts
left out important information.
--
Ryan Lee ryanlee_at_w3.org
W3C Research Engineer +1.617.253.5327
http://simile.mit.edu/
Received on Fri Jun 24 2005 - 18:58:43 EDT