RE: FW: [Jena-devel] FYI: New CVS module: BRQL

From: David R. Karger <karger_at_theory.csail.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:10:24 -0400

Yes, that is what I understood from your previous post. But it seems
that the "OPTIONAL" keyword is basically syntactic sugar for the kind
of query I included in my email---where we use an existential over
the property name and require it be one of the properties we care about.
The syntactic sugar is certainly nice, but does the approach I mentioned
work in plain RDQL?
Received on Thu Jul 29 2004 - 15:10:24 EDT