Re: Updated Fresnel Ontologies and Examples

From: Ryan Lee <>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:45:16 -0500

Chris Bizer wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel, Stefano, Ryan and David,
> I have committed updated Fresnel ontologies and examples containing the
> results from our discussions this week to the repository:

Thanks Chris.

My issues deal with term names. I don't quite like it when property /
object names come close to colliding, i.e.:

  :someLens f:purpose [ a f:Purpose ] .

where the property is just one case away from the class.

I also don't quite like it when terms collide with well-known terms,
such as f:label vs. rdfs:label and f:value vs. rdf:value.

There's nothing wrong with either, only a matter of my preferences.

Ryan Lee       
W3C Research Engineer    +1.617.253.5327
Received on Fri Mar 11 2005 - 22:44:03 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Aug 09 2012 - 16:39:17 EDT