Chris Bizer wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel, Stefano, Ryan and David,
>
> I have committed updated Fresnel ontologies and examples containing the
> results from our discussions this week to the repository:
Thanks Chris.
My issues deal with term names. I don't quite like it when property /
object names come close to colliding, i.e.:
:someLens f:purpose [ a f:Purpose ] .
where the property is just one case away from the class.
I also don't quite like it when terms collide with well-known terms,
such as f:label vs. rdfs:label and f:value vs. rdf:value.
There's nothing wrong with either, only a matter of my preferences.
--
Ryan Lee ryanlee_at_w3.org
W3C Research Engineer +1.617.253.5327
http://simile.mit.edu/
Received on Fri Mar 11 2005 - 22:44:03 EST