On May 25, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Danny Ayers wrote:
> This looks great!
Thanks! any / all feedback is certainly welcomed.
> Quick question - do you happen to know the status/plans for SPARQL in
> Sesame? It's not altogether clear from the docs (RQL, SeRQL..?)
I don't know the specific status, but I do know Jeen Broekstra is a
contributing member of the DAWG. [1] I've been meaning to poke him
about the status of this ...
> I do fancy running a Semantic Bank, what interests me in particular is
> playing with intercomms between that and a Redland store I've got
> running (sometimes). Ideally I'd like the main lingua to be SPARQL.
... for exactly this reason. :)
We very much expect SPARQL to be the primary query language among
piggy-bank / semantic-bank (and other semweb stores) in the future.
We're a bit a head of the curve here, but with the way DAWG is going,
its not sure for how long. :)
[1]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who
--
eric miller http://www.w3.org/people/em/
semantic web activity lead http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/
w3c world wide web consortium http://www.w3.org/
Received on Wed May 25 2005 - 18:17:28 EDT