Re: Pending vocabulary issues + further proceeding

From: Ryan Lee <>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 16:13:22 -0400

Emmanuel Pietriga wrote:
> Ryan Lee wrote:
>> I'd like to call for a brainstorm on different names here; I feel
>> 'style' is misleading in this context. I'm not attached to transform,
>> though the justification in my mind is that it's supposed to describe
>> changing the labels of and embellishing the actual content. I consider
>> 'style' to be a last resort in case we can't think of anything more
>> appropriate.
> I more or less share your point of view. But I don't have any
> suggestion right now.

- (content) customization
- folding
- mixing
- remixing
- garnishing
- transform
- style

I had cooking on my mind...

>> I'll point back at a workshop position paper that's due July 30.
>> Shall we use that as a solid target and pick dates based on that
>> deadline?
> Yes. I reread de CfP for this workshop, and I think we definitely need
> to submit something there. Let's consider this as our "final" deadline,
> knowing that verything else should be in place before then (especially
> the web site).

What are we aiming to accomplish by then?

- concensus on Fresnel goals
- finalize terms
- publish core ontology that's as complete in its description as possible
- publish Fresnel website to
- experience reports?

DavidK appears to be on the program committee.

I can guess at what a position paper should say, though I've not written
one. Could our topic be on how Fresnel can be used to increase user-end
comprehension of information represented in RDF? How much of Fresnel
needs to be in a working state to make those claims?

>> On a different note, I checked out and compiled and am starting to
>> look into how to integrate Emmanuel's FSL code into my work in progress.
> You mean the ANTLR-based FSL parser? I still have a lot of work to do on
> this. I've been busy with the VL/HCC conference and other stuff for the
> past few weeks, but I plan to resume work on this implementation very
> soon. Ryan, are you waiting for something specific on this side from me?

Not really; our repository examples don't work in it, but that seems to
be because of the PREFIX information. I presume you've thought about
how to take the parse tree to Jena to get a set of results back and was
wondering if you were going to write that bit or if I could help?

Ryan Lee       
W3C Research Engineer    +1.617.253.5327
Received on Thu May 19 2005 - 20:12:03 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Aug 09 2012 - 16:40:51 EDT