Emmanuel Pietriga wrote:
> Ryan Lee wrote:
> 
>> Emmanuel Pietriga wrote:
>>
>>> Ryan Lee wrote:
>>>> I'll point back at a workshop position paper that's due July 30.  
>>>> Shall we use that as a solid target and pick dates based on that 
>>>> deadline?
>>>
>>> Yes. I reread de CfP for this workshop, and I think we definitely 
>>> need to submit something there. Let's consider this as our "final" 
>>> deadline, knowing that verything else should be in place before then 
>>> (especially the web site).
>>
>> What are we aiming to accomplish by then?
>>
>> - concensus on Fresnel goals
>> - finalize terms
>> - publish core ontology that's as complete in its description as possible
>> - publish Fresnel website to w3.org
>> - experience reports?
> 
> Yes. Experience reports, I'm not sure. Would you be willing to do that? 
> Anyone else?
Yes, I would.
>>>> On a different note, I checked out and compiled and am starting to 
>>>> look into how to integrate Emmanuel's FSL code into my work in 
>>>> progress.
>>>
>>> You mean the ANTLR-based FSL parser? I still have a lot of work to do 
>>> on this. I've been busy with the VL/HCC conference and other stuff 
>>> for the past few weeks, but I plan to resume work on this 
>>> implementation very soon. Ryan, are you waiting for something 
>>> specific on this side from me?
>>
>> Not really; our repository examples don't work in it, but that seems 
>> to be because of the PREFIX information.  I presume you've thought 
>> about how to take the parse tree to Jena to get a set of results back 
>> and was wondering if you were going to write that bit or if I could help?
> 
> I'm working on getting a more usable representation of the expression 
> than the current AST. Once I have this, I will have to write the code 
> that actually evaluates an FSL expression on a model.
Ok.
> As far as this PREFIX problem is concerned, I haven't given it much 
> thought yet. Did we agree on how to declare these in Fresnel? I don't 
> think so.
Something else for the issues list then.  I thought we had tentatively 
agreed on what's in the examples, that every FSL expression would have 
to carry PREFIX information with it.  I don't recall if our other 
alternatives were still under consideration.
-- 
Ryan Lee                 ryanlee_at_w3.org
W3C Research Engineer    +1.617.253.5327
http://simile.mit.edu/
Received on Fri May 20 2005 - 22:10:14 EDT