Ryan Lee wrote:
> Emmanuel Pietriga wrote:
>
>> Ryan Lee wrote:
>>
>>>> OK. In the Simile subversion repository, under fresnel I see a "trunk"
>>>> that runs with Sesame, and under "branches" I see "jena-base", and a
>>>> version that apparently runs under Jena. How do the two versions in CVS
>>>> compare? Is the Sesame version more complete, or are they roughly equal
>>>> in functionality and maturity?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> At the point I felt it was approximately functionally complete, I
>>> made the leap from developing on Jena to developing in Sesame. I
>>> don't know how to quantify the differences in features now, but the
>>> branch occurred in August, and I've made bugfixes and added features
>>> (like FSL support) in Sesame that weren't rolled back into the Jena
>>> version, which I no longer support.
>>
>>
>> Ryan, what's the status of the Sesame 1.2 FSL engine? Any chance we
>> can make a standalone release of it?
>
>
> I think so.
>
> If I forget the hierarchy store for now and put my files together with a
> checkout of the fresnel/ directory, minus any files that rely on
> Jena/Sesame2, I see only one repeated compilation error. FSLParser.java
> in Eclipse tells me the recover method is missing, so I added this based
> on some quick Google searches:
>
> protected void recover(RecognitionException ex, BitSet bs) throws
> TokenStreamException {
> consume();
> consumeUntil(bs);
> }
>
> I don't really know what that method is for, but the error goes away.
>
> I'll try to put together a build system for generating a jar today.
>
That' s really weird, I've never seen this error, and I often rebuild
all my source code from scratch.
What version of ANTLR do you have ? The FSL parser relies on the latest
(2.7.5).
--
Emmanuel Pietriga
INRIA Futurs - Projet In Situ tel : +33 1 69 15 34 66
Bat 490, Université Paris-Sud fax : +33 1 69 15 65 86
91405 ORSAY Cedex FRANCE http://www.lri.fr/~pietriga
Received on Thu Dec 01 2005 - 07:13:48 EST